Author Archives: Gary Fettke

Why am I on this this ‘public’ journey of Public Health awareness?

DSCN2839No bureaucrat has ever asked me that. Ever. They just seem to see me as a troublemaker.

When you find something that makes a real difference to your patients lives you have to do something about it, even if the response from the system and your peers is there every day.

Adopting a lifestyle with less processed foods in it is a no brainer for me. It just happens to end up being low in sugar, low in refined carbohydrates and involves foods with good protein and healthy fats – not processed ones. And I call it LCHF – Low Carb Healthy Fat.

My friend, Dr Jason Fung from Ontario Canada, tells his story and in particular to Type 2 Diabetes management.

“Then came the inescapable, horrifying conclusion.

We, as doctors, had been treating T2D exactly wrong.

And that is why I have started this journey. Because with the proper treatment, T2D is a curable disease.

T2D is a disease of too much insulin, just as obesity results from too much insulin. The treatment is to lower insulin, not raise it. We weren’t just not treating T2D, we were making it worse.”

https://intensivedietarymanagement.com/my-journey/

‘Cholesterol’ tests for you and your doctor

Lipid profile 2

‘Cholesterol’ tests for you and your doctor – the 1 page handout.

This is education both ways. Download it and discuss it with your doctor.

This is what to expect if you go LCHF – Low Carb and Healthy Fat living.

The ongoing question I receive from patients and doctors is about the ‘cholesterol’ level. I keep saying that in isolation the cholesterol level is meaningless and creates more distress and anxiety for patients wanting to adopt a Low Sugar and Carbohydrate lifestyle. This means consuming more, but not masses, of healthy fats – nuts, pasture fed meats, dairy, avocado are staples.

The higher proportion of healthy fat in a diet seems to put most doctors into a tailspin of concern of ‘What about your cholesterol?’

From a cardiovascular risk factor aspect, there is only one number to be interested in. That is not some ratio combining different components of but the ACTUAL number of Small Dense LDL particles. Continue reading

The DAA slip up in Science Week 2015

11866483_1005155349514867_5620484925760225789_nThere’s something not quite right about this message from the Dietitians Association of Australia (DAA) yesterday.

It’s National Science Week – I agree on that.

Nutrition is a Science – I agree on that.

Dietitians have a science degree in human nutrition and dietetics – not quite true. There are variations on that, but let us not squabble.

“APD’s are the ONLY university qualified experts who give advice on food and nutrition” – bollocks.

I am in a Science Week debate tonight on the very issue of “Is fruit good or bad for you?” The DAA can argue until the cows come home whether or not an Orthopaedic Surgeon with a university degree and a few letters after his name (M.B.,B.S.(UNSW), F.R.A.C.S.(Orthopaedic), F.A.Orth.A.) can give advice on food and nutrition but…

I come to the defense here of my co-debater tonight. Professor Roger Stanley has a university degree and is the Director for the Centre for Food Innovation in Tasmania. He ONLY gives advice on food and nutrition to the Defense Department, several peak bodies and to the food industry.

With all ‘due respect’ to the DAA – you have it wrong on who can give advice on food and nutrition.

I am not alone on this front. The DAA members are even writing in.

“I am a dietitian, an APD and a DAA member and unfortunately DAA I think you have messed up here….please consider diversifying this message to make it more inclusive of others peoples abilities….”

There’s quite a colourful debate going on. And so there should be. Any thoughts?

If you want to come along to another debate this evening which should be more civil, then the Launceston Church Grammar School is the place to find out if fruit is good or bad for you? We have a 6pm start.

https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/is-fruit-good-or-bad-for-yo…

‘Cholesterol’ tests for you and your doctor – the 1 page handout.

Gary Fettke No Fructose's photo.

This is education both ways. Download it and discuss it with your doctor.

This is what to expect if you go LCHF – Low Carb and Healthy Fat living.

The ongoing question I receive from patients and doctors is about the ‘cholesterol’ level. I keep saying that in isolation the cholesterol level is meaningless and creates more distress and anxiety for patients wanting to adopt a Low Sugar and Carbohydrate lifestyle. This means consuming more, but not masses, of healthy fats – nuts, pasture fed meats, dairy, avocado are staples.

The higher proportion of healthy fat in a diet seems to put most doctors into a tailspin of concern of ‘What about your cholesterol?’

From a cardiovascular risk factor aspect, there is only one number to be interested in. That is not some ratio combining different components of but the ACTUAL number of Small Dense LDL particles.

It can be measured indirectly by the Triglyceride level and if that is under 0.8 then it is unlikely that you have any significant number of small dense LDL’s in circulation.

If the concern continues then have a Lipid Subfraction Analysis. That will show you the exact breakdown of all lipids in your bloodstream. It is fast becoming the go to test in Cardiology research because it is accurate and not based on ratios or subtraction equations. It may cost you about $100 in some places but that is infinitely cheaper than the cost of taking a statin drug for the rest of your life based on some ‘cholesterol’ number on a page.

One of my patients has allowed me to post up a bit of her story and her Lipid Subfraction Analysis. She has shifted into a LCHF lifestyle, feels much better, healthier and lost a fair amount of weight. Her standard lipid tests showed her Cholesterol level to jump from 5.5 (9/2014) to 10.9 – her GP was ‘gravely concerned’ to say the least.

Her LDL Cholesterol had also skyrocketed from 3.3 (9/2014) to 8.2 with all sorts of alarm bells ringing with the doctor. Her ‘good’ HDL Cholesterol had also gone up but that was being ignored.
A Lipid Subfraction Analysis was called for and surprise, surprise – “Type A (NORMAL) profile. No additional risk of an adverse cardiac event”

Her good HDL’s were up and the circulating LDL’s were in the larger particle size and working as transporters – and all of that is fine. Result is less worry all round – and no statins.

One of my Cardiology colleagues is now on board with the LCHF lifestyle and has seen these results several times with patients. That Lipid Subfraction Analysis has been a major factor in his ‘coming around’ to LCHF living.

Download the PDF handout and start discussing it with your doctor. Let them know that you are informed of options before you start a lifetime dependence on statins with their known side effects.

Download available from http://www.nofructose.com/?p=614

“LIPIDS
Lipid profiles do change when you adopt an LCHF diet. The most profound change is a significant reduction of small dense LDL particles. These are a by-product of fructose metabolism and are the dangerous-sized LDLs associated with cardiovascular disease. They are not directly measured by any routine lipid testing.

The small dense LDLs are indirectly measured by the Triglyceride level. A number of 0.8 or less is indicative of no small dense LDLs in circulation. This is the cheapest method of assessing progress following LCHF principles.

Fat transport and mobilisation occurs on a low carbohydrate diet. This increased fat utilisation means more large ‘fluffy’ LDL particles are in action and therefore the overall cholesterol and LDL-C numbers may rise. This is not a concern.

The HDL levels generally rise which is an indicator of a healthy cardiovascular clearing system.

If concerns are raised regarding standard lipid profiles then other tests are available. The definitive one is a Lipid Subfraction Analysis which is readily available. It will define exact lipoprotein levels in a spectral analysis. Patients can expect to see a major reduction in the small particle sizes of zones 5, 6 and 7 (the small dense LDL ‘bad cholesterol’ particles). There generally is a rise in the large ‘fluffy’ transport LDLs in zone 1 and 2 (that is because fat is now being mobilised as a fuel source). HDL numbers are generally high. This will be reflected in a ‘low risk’ summary report.

Further information, including a 20 minute video by A/Professor Ken Sikaris, Chemical Pathologist at Melbourne Pathology, is available at http://www.nofructose.com/introduction/cholesterol-testing/

https://www.facebook.com/393958287365295/photos/a.407869679307489.94446.393958287365295/882392208521898/?type=3

How unnatural is our fruit nowadays?

How much has the food industry manufactured our fruit to have more sugar and less fibre?

I think it is a major problem that our fruit found at the supermarket is rarely fresh, has been treated with a variety of chemicals all along the planting to harvest path and is nowhere near as nutritious that we have been led to believe.

Is fruit good or bad for you?

That’s the topic of debate for Science Week on Thursday evening at 6pm at the Grammar School here in Launceston.

I have been asked to take up one side of that debate with Professor Roger Stanley on the opposition. Roger is the Professor of Food Science and Technology at the University of Tasmania. Hopefully I can give my esteemed colleague a few points of discussion smile emoticon

It should be an interesting forum presenting at the Royal Australian Chemical Institute annual event.

If you are around then come along to this free public event. Tickets are available at https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/is-fruit-good-or-bad-for-yo…

I will be chatting tomorrow afternoon at about 215 pm on ABC radio about the debate.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/how-fruits-have-evovled-over-time-2014-10

 

How do you confuse consumers with food labelling?

Consumers are highly susceptible to the symbolic information that food marketers may specifically use on labelling to promote their products, write the researchers.

How do you confuse consumers with food labelling?

It’s called ‘Green’washing and ‘Nutri’washing. Making a food product better on paper than it might be.

“Simply adding the word “fruit” makes sugar healthier: The misleading effect of symbolic information on the perceived healthiness of food.”

Is the public hospital health system terminal?

Bulging hospitalThe Tasmanian State hospital system is failing – might as well throw in the Australian one as well.

Increasing demands on the system are causing bed shortages, blown out waiting lists for elective surgery and several months of waiting just to get appointments to get into the system.

This is just bad for everyone. Patients are suffering and when they finally get in are often sicker. That just costs more to everyone and not just money.

It would be good if the politicians and bureaucrats had it worked out but they don’t and they don’t look like they are going to sort it out any time soon. Continue reading

Statin side effects or LCHF?

Gary Fettke No Fructose's photo.

How do statins create their side effects?

Statins provide only a small benefit of reducing your risk of dying from a heart attack if you have had a previous heart attack but they come at a cost. And that cost looks to be increasing. There is now increasing evidence of increased risks of diabetes, cancer, dementia, cataracts and musculoskeletal pain for those taking statin drugs.

Anything that reduces cholesterol production has far reaching consequences. Cholesterol is an integral part of our cell membranes, it holds us together. It makes up nearly 20% of our brains and it is integral to hormone production. If we keep affecting the building blocks of our cells then we have the potential to affect our long term health.

Most of the statin trials have been short term and tend to skip over the side effects. The benefits of reduction of risk sound a lot better when the drug companies push the relative risk reductions of these drugs rather than the actual numbers. A 1% absolute reduction from 3% doesn’t sound nearly as impressive as a 33% relative risk reduction. Guess what the drug companies push? It’s just statistics but… it’s also marketing. The long term studies are starting to look dubious when it comes to side effects. This just released paper looks at how that ‘collateral’ damage is occurring.

“The risks of statin use are associated with statins’ negative effects on stem cell function, according to the researchers. Statin therapy benefits individuals with atherosclerosis, but because of its effects on stem cells, it may not be appropriate as a preventive measure for those who do not have cardiovascular disease.”

The other more effective option is lifestyle changes – diet and exercise. That can reduce your risk of cardiovascular disease by factors of 40% plus in some papers. The literature is hard to pin down on those figures but virtually every paper puts diet, exercise, weight loss and cessation of smoking at the top of the list. Unfortunately for the individual that means some responsibility, some effort and some changes. But those changes are infinitely more effective than taking a tablet.

Those lifestyle improvements will not just help your heart, they have far reaching benefits across all diseases.

A Lowering of your sugar and Carbohydrate intake and replacing it with the right amount of Healthy Fats (LCHF) is an effective lifestyle choice. I can’t work out why the medical profession is taking so long to work this out – to ‘get it’.

I honestly believe that with the right dietary changes many people could reduce their medications and particularly statins. Having the right blood investigations at the beginning – a Lipid Subfraction Analysis is the only true test reflecting your lipid profile.

There is no way that I would start a statin drug until I have that test. Find out exactly what the particle numbers are before starting a lifelong intake of a drug that may not be quite as good as the drug companies tell us. Please have this discussion with your doctor – and hopefully they ‘get it’.

Come and ‘get it’ at our Choose Health forum next month. More importantly, drag your doctor along to ‘get it’ at http://www.eventbrite.com.au/o/nutrition-for-life-7299741993

More on cholesterol testing and the Lipid Subfraction Analysis at http://www.nofructose.com/introduction/cholesterol-testing/

http://www.newswise.com/…/new-research-shows-why-statins-sh…

The articles and the references at http://www.nofructose.com/?p=3008

https://www.facebook.com/393958287365295/photos/a.407869679307489.94446.393958287365295/879077048853414/?type=3

Statin side effects or LCHF?

Get itHow do statins create their side effects?

Statins provide only a small benefit of reducing your risk of dying from a heart attack if you have had a previous heart attack but they come at a cost. And that cost looks to be increasing. There is now increasing evidence of increased risks of diabetes, cancer, dementia, cataracts and musculoskeletal pain for those taking statin drugs.

Anything that reduces cholesterol production has far reaching consequences. Cholesterol is an integral part of our cell membranes, it holds us together. It makes up nearly 20% of our brains and it is integral to hormone production. If we keep affecting the building blocks of our cells then we have the potential to affect our long term health.

Most of the statin trials have been short term and tend to skip over the side effects. Continue reading

Skipping breakfast makes it easier to maintain and lose weight.

Gary Fettke No Fructose's photo.

The ‘myth’ of having to have breakfast is up for discussion in this weeks Editorial of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Skipping breakfast (for adults) results in lower overall energy intake per day.

“Skipping breakfast should be enough to reduce, at least, the rate of gain in weight for people who regularly consume breakfast.”

The editorial is pretty damning on the food industry too.

“Unfortunately, the advice to eliminate breakfast will surely pit us, as nutritional scientists, against the very strong and powerful food industry. This industry has an economic interest in maintaining the current rate of energy ingestion by the population.”

“If we are truly concerned about the health of the American public, we must stand against these powerful forces and proclaim that we can no longer eat just because food is available. Rather, we must learn to live with consuming less energy.”

These comments are starting to come out in the literature. 🙂

http://ajcn.nutrition.org/…/ear…/2015/08/12/ajcn.115.118398…

Apologies if some of you cannot get the full article. I will try and source it as it comes out. Stay tuned.

Other food tricks at http://www.nofructose.com/food-ideas/food-tricks/

https://www.facebook.com/393958287365295/photos/a.407869679307489.94446.393958287365295/878548898906229/?type=3